Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of low-dose esketamine on sleep quality in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy

Huan Li, Huizhen Wu, Jian Peng

Department of Anesthesiology, Guanggu District, Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan City, Hubei Province 430070, China;

For correspondence:-  Jian Peng   Email: PengJian@symc-edu.cn

Accepted: 25 March 2023        Published: 29 April 2023

Citation: Li H, Wu H, Peng J. Evaluation of low-dose esketamine on sleep quality in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Trop J Pharm Res 2023; 22(4):887-891 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v22i4.23

© 2023 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of low-dose esketamine on sleep quality in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.
Methods: A total of 84 patients (ASA grade II - III, > 65 years old) who were to undergo painless gastroscopy in Guanggu District, Wuhan Third Hospital from June to July 2021 were enrolled. The diagnosis of sleep disorder was performed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) before surgery. Patients with PSQI ≥ 5 were diagnosed with a sleep disorder (group E, n = 42), while those with PSQI < 5 were normal (group C, n = 42). Patients in both groups were given a single intravenous injection of esketamine 0.2 mg/kg 3 min before anesthesia induction, followed by an intravenous loading dose of propofol 1.5 mg/kg. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved by intravenous pumping with propofol at 4 mg/kg per hour.
Results: Sleep quality of patients in both groups improved after surgery, but the PSQI scores decreased more than that of group E (p < 0.05), especially on the night after surgery. Compared with group C, anesthesia induction time was longer and the number of propofol supplementation was increased in group E (p < 0.05). Groups C and E manifested no significant differences in postoperative satisfaction and occurrence of adverse reactions (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Low-dose esketamine improves the sleep quality of elderly patients with painless gastroscopy without increasing the risk of circulating breathing during surgery. However, multi-center large-scale studies will be required in further investigations in order to validate the findings of this study.

Keywords: Esketamine, Sleep quality, Painless gastroscopy, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates